Gambling operators in Spain have agreed to a new voluntary code of conduct on advertising in a bid to avoid tougher, mandatory rules which could be imposed by the government. Taking effect from January 2020, the regulator has approved the new rules but it’s too early to tell whether the tough coalition government will think they’ve gone far enough.
The advertising legislation was created by online betting trade association in Spain, JDigital and has been given the green light for launch on 15 January 2020 by regulator, Dirección General de Ordenación del Juego (DGOJ).
Adopting a responsible approach
The new code of conduct largely mimics the legislation in other country which calls upon betting firms to take a responsible approach when considering their advertising campaigns. This includes not showing images of anyone who appears to be under 25, refraining from celebrity endorsements with a large youth fanbase and not using any professional athletes to promote gambling. The message of responsible gambling must also be prominent in any type of advertisement.
Other limitations include a restriction on the number of bonus offers which are made but they don’t go as far as restrictions in place in other countries. For example, in the UK there is a “whistle to whistle” block on advertising which prevents any promotional ads being shown during competitive events.
Some of the members of the Jdigital online betting group include Bet365, The Stars Group and GVC Holdings together with local operators such as R Franco and Luckia. The operators will be hoping that the new code will pacify a government which had previously threatened a tough clampdown on all gambling ads in a move backed by the country’s ombudsman.
New coalition government
Elections last week couldn’t produce an outright majority in government so a coalition has been struck up between the PSOE ruling party and UP, the party that campaigns against austerity. The UP has been particularly vocal in its opposition of gambling and given the chance would restrict operators in any way possible.
However, UP have had their own recent scandals. During their election campaign they showed an individual who claimed his life had been ruined by bookmakers and betting, and was now destitute. Super-sleuths soon tracked down the man online after he uploaded a video from his recent skiing holiday, throwing doubt on the “testimony” that he had provided about the damage done by gambling.
November 19, 2019
Online Gambling Delayed by Six Months in the Netherlands
The Netherlands has announced that the planned launch of online gambling in the country is being put back by six months. The new date for the anticipated start will now be 1 July 2021 to give the country enough time to pass and vet applications from operators.
According to the Sander Dekker, Minister of Justice and Security, the reason for the delay is due to the proposed changes made to Remote Gambling Act which means it won’t come into force until 1 January 2021. As this is six months later than originally expected, the secondary legislation around licensing has been delayed by the same length of time.
Verification process
The regulator in the Netherlands, Kansspelautoriteit (KSA), had previously announced that no gambling company would be able to apply for a licence under the new legislation until it has been formally enacted. It also said that it needs six months to process and check any applications. As the release date for the Remote Gambling Act has been pushed back by six months, the regulator has insisted that the launch date for operational play is delayed too.
Part of this process will include checking that each operator has a robust age-verification system in place. The minister said that underage gamblers had in the past been able to access state-run sports betting without a problem and he was concerned that the issue may be repeated with other online betting.
The Nederlandse Loterij has since upgraded its processes to block younger gamblers and Dekker said they expect other gambling operators to do the same, or else face sanctions.
A pro-gambling government
It wasn’t all negative news for the gambling industry however as Dekker insisted that preventing gambling advertisements was not on the government’s agenda. Some legislators had been renewing their calls for a total ban but the minister said that was not an “objective of the current Dutch gambling policy”.
Dekker said there was evidence that restricting gambling advertisements could have a negative impact on those who play, as it would remove the ability to channel individuals towards locally licensed sites which are robustly checked and supervised. Without the ability to monitor, implement and drive responsible gambling initiatives in the same way, this could lead to more problem gambling .
The minister admitted that they may consider tightening existing gambling rules in certain areas. The legislation they may toughen up includes introducing a time limit on advertising through certain types of media, stopping behaviour targeting and restricting credits for free play or other bonus offers. Celebrity endorsements are also likely to be overhauled, particularly those who may have a strong appeal to younger players.
According to the Sander Dekker, Minister of Justice and Security, the reason for the delay is due to the proposed changes made to Remote Gambling Act which means it won’t come into force until 1 January 2021. As this is six months later than originally expected, the secondary legislation around licensing has been delayed by the same length of time.
Verification process
The regulator in the Netherlands, Kansspelautoriteit (KSA), had previously announced that no gambling company would be able to apply for a licence under the new legislation until it has been formally enacted. It also said that it needs six months to process and check any applications. As the release date for the Remote Gambling Act has been pushed back by six months, the regulator has insisted that the launch date for operational play is delayed too.
Part of this process will include checking that each operator has a robust age-verification system in place. The minister said that underage gamblers had in the past been able to access state-run sports betting without a problem and he was concerned that the issue may be repeated with other online betting.
The Nederlandse Loterij has since upgraded its processes to block younger gamblers and Dekker said they expect other gambling operators to do the same, or else face sanctions.
A pro-gambling government
It wasn’t all negative news for the gambling industry however as Dekker insisted that preventing gambling advertisements was not on the government’s agenda. Some legislators had been renewing their calls for a total ban but the minister said that was not an “objective of the current Dutch gambling policy”.
Dekker said there was evidence that restricting gambling advertisements could have a negative impact on those who play, as it would remove the ability to channel individuals towards locally licensed sites which are robustly checked and supervised. Without the ability to monitor, implement and drive responsible gambling initiatives in the same way, this could lead to more problem gambling .
The minister admitted that they may consider tightening existing gambling rules in certain areas. The legislation they may toughen up includes introducing a time limit on advertising through certain types of media, stopping behaviour targeting and restricting credits for free play or other bonus offers. Celebrity endorsements are also likely to be overhauled, particularly those who may have a strong appeal to younger players.
November 14, 2019
Australian Regulator Goes To War With Illegal Operators
Australian Media Regulator the ACMA will instruct Internet providers to block overseas illegal online gambling operators to protect what it says are vulnerable gamblers.
Since the 2015 interactive review by then premier Barry O’Farell some 65 online operators that were serving the Australian market have left however some are still operating and have been named such as, FairGo Casino and Emu Casino that operate out of a Curacao license.
The AMCA say that Aussie gamblers spend upwards of $400 million a year on these illegal sites which works out to be a loss of around $100 million in loss of taxes to the government.
Not only this say the AMCA but most do not pay out on big wins or a small proportion of it. The Chairwoman of the AMCA Nerida O’Loughlin said, “We have been targeting illegal gambling services we know are active in the Australian market through complaints received and monitoring. But we expect that list of sites will grow as we investigate more,” Ms O’Loughlin said.
“The ability to have ISPs block illegal websites will be a valuable additional weapon in the ACMA’s arsenal in the fight against illegal online gambling.” She went on to say, “Customers had also experienced illegal operators continuing to withdraw funds from their bank account without authorisation.”
“If you have funds deposited with an illegal gambling site, you should withdraw those funds now.
“Public education is also crucial in deterring Australians from using these sites, given many illegal offshore gambling websites target Australians by using Australian themes and images, such as the Australian flag and native animals,” Ms O’Loughlin finished by saying.
Since the 2015 interactive review by then premier Barry O’Farell some 65 online operators that were serving the Australian market have left however some are still operating and have been named such as, FairGo Casino and Emu Casino that operate out of a Curacao license.
The AMCA say that Aussie gamblers spend upwards of $400 million a year on these illegal sites which works out to be a loss of around $100 million in loss of taxes to the government.
Not only this say the AMCA but most do not pay out on big wins or a small proportion of it. The Chairwoman of the AMCA Nerida O’Loughlin said, “We have been targeting illegal gambling services we know are active in the Australian market through complaints received and monitoring. But we expect that list of sites will grow as we investigate more,” Ms O’Loughlin said.
“The ability to have ISPs block illegal websites will be a valuable additional weapon in the ACMA’s arsenal in the fight against illegal online gambling.” She went on to say, “Customers had also experienced illegal operators continuing to withdraw funds from their bank account without authorisation.”
“If you have funds deposited with an illegal gambling site, you should withdraw those funds now.
“Public education is also crucial in deterring Australians from using these sites, given many illegal offshore gambling websites target Australians by using Australian themes and images, such as the Australian flag and native animals,” Ms O’Loughlin finished by saying.
November 13, 2019
Latvian Consumers Warned by Regulator Over Rogue Lotteries
The Latvian gambling regulator has issued a warning to customers about sham lotteries operating in the country. The Lotteries and Gambling Supervisory Inspection (IAUI) has cautioned any customer who is considering taking part to fully check out the operator online before parting with any cash.
Many of these rogue operators contact customers to claim they have winnings to pay out, and the Latvian regulator is keen to prevent unsuspecting individuals from handing over sensitive information.
Red flags to look out for
The IAUI has admitted that it is very hard to spot a fake lottery operator for certain as many do an excellent job as masquerading as the real deal. However by exercising caution and being watchful the regulator believes that it’s possible to avoid falling into their trap.
Before buying tickets, Latvian consumers should research the company to see if there is any evidence that they are running a legitimate lottery. No money should be handed over if there is no proof that the lottery operate is genuine with a proven track record.
It’s not just the purchase of the tickets that is a problem however as many rogue lottery providers are contacting consumers to tell them of a “win”. The IAUI said any email about a win for a lottery that players don’t remember entering should be viewed with extreme caution.
Fraudsters commonly make contact by telephone as well as by email. The lucky “winner” will be asked to cover the costs of opening an account and transferring the winnings. They are usually also told that they’ll need to pay tax on their windfall.
The regulator said that when contact is made through a public email server such as hotmail and gmail, there is a much higher risk that the email could be a fake. Other tell-tale signs include spelling or grammatical mistakes in the Latvian language; this suggests that a bot is responsible the correspondence and is once again, a scam.
Any individual who has taken part in a lottery and believes that the communication could be genuine should look for confirmation in the details provided. In cases where the winner is legitimate, the operator should provide the name of the individual and the winning ticket number in its response. The player can then check this information against their own ticket to verify the authenticity.
IAUI warned that no reputable lottery would ask for taxes or any other form of payment in order to pay out the winnings. Therefore any company that does should be treated as potentially suspicious.
Many of these rogue operators contact customers to claim they have winnings to pay out, and the Latvian regulator is keen to prevent unsuspecting individuals from handing over sensitive information.
Red flags to look out for
The IAUI has admitted that it is very hard to spot a fake lottery operator for certain as many do an excellent job as masquerading as the real deal. However by exercising caution and being watchful the regulator believes that it’s possible to avoid falling into their trap.
Before buying tickets, Latvian consumers should research the company to see if there is any evidence that they are running a legitimate lottery. No money should be handed over if there is no proof that the lottery operate is genuine with a proven track record.
It’s not just the purchase of the tickets that is a problem however as many rogue lottery providers are contacting consumers to tell them of a “win”. The IAUI said any email about a win for a lottery that players don’t remember entering should be viewed with extreme caution.
Fraudsters commonly make contact by telephone as well as by email. The lucky “winner” will be asked to cover the costs of opening an account and transferring the winnings. They are usually also told that they’ll need to pay tax on their windfall.
The regulator said that when contact is made through a public email server such as hotmail and gmail, there is a much higher risk that the email could be a fake. Other tell-tale signs include spelling or grammatical mistakes in the Latvian language; this suggests that a bot is responsible the correspondence and is once again, a scam.
Any individual who has taken part in a lottery and believes that the communication could be genuine should look for confirmation in the details provided. In cases where the winner is legitimate, the operator should provide the name of the individual and the winning ticket number in its response. The player can then check this information against their own ticket to verify the authenticity.
IAUI warned that no reputable lottery would ask for taxes or any other form of payment in order to pay out the winnings. Therefore any company that does should be treated as potentially suspicious.
Dutch Regulator Says New Online Licences Almost Ready
The gambling regulator in the Netherlands, the Kansspelautoriteit (KSA) has announced that once the legislation comes into force applicants will be able to obtain their licence. The Netherlands Remote Gambling Act was passed earlier this year and the body has provided more information about what will be required to obtain a licence to operate.
A regulated gambling market is planned for launch in January 2021, just over one year away, but some of the legislation is expected to come into force from next summer.
A change for the Netherlands
The decision from the Dutch senate to approve online gambling means that there will be four difference licences available for purchase. These include casino games where the player is up against the operator (such as table games and slots), online poker and other peer-to-peer casino games, sporting events betting and horse racing and trotting betting.
Anyone wishing to apply for an online licence in any of these areas will have to complete the application in Dutch and pay the fee which is non-refundable. Each application costs €45,000 and if a licence is not granted, this fee will not be returned.
Raft of requirements
It may seem a fairly straightforward matter to obtain the licence but it is not just about proving the operator’s identity. The KSA has a long list of robust requirements that it expects every operator to meet if it wants to offer its services to the Dutch market.
These are wide-ranging and including aspects of Dutch consumer law as well as global legislation on gambling and good practice.
Each operator must demonstrate that it will follow tight rules on checking the identity of customers and have a strict policy which helps to enforce the prevention of fraud. They must agree to work closely with the KSA to prevent match-fixing or corruption within sport and its marketing campaign must be vetted by the regulator in advance.
The KSA also announced that it will be utilising advanced technology so it can be connected to operators at all times. This will take the form of a Control Database which every operator must be linked with. This connection will enable the KSA to check digital data at any time and satisfy itself that rules are being properly adhered to.
With such a long list of requirements to qualify for a licence, the KSA has said it will be running workshops to help operators make sure they’re meeting all the conditions before applying.
A regulated gambling market is planned for launch in January 2021, just over one year away, but some of the legislation is expected to come into force from next summer.
A change for the Netherlands
The decision from the Dutch senate to approve online gambling means that there will be four difference licences available for purchase. These include casino games where the player is up against the operator (such as table games and slots), online poker and other peer-to-peer casino games, sporting events betting and horse racing and trotting betting.
Anyone wishing to apply for an online licence in any of these areas will have to complete the application in Dutch and pay the fee which is non-refundable. Each application costs €45,000 and if a licence is not granted, this fee will not be returned.
Raft of requirements
It may seem a fairly straightforward matter to obtain the licence but it is not just about proving the operator’s identity. The KSA has a long list of robust requirements that it expects every operator to meet if it wants to offer its services to the Dutch market.
These are wide-ranging and including aspects of Dutch consumer law as well as global legislation on gambling and good practice.
Each operator must demonstrate that it will follow tight rules on checking the identity of customers and have a strict policy which helps to enforce the prevention of fraud. They must agree to work closely with the KSA to prevent match-fixing or corruption within sport and its marketing campaign must be vetted by the regulator in advance.
The KSA also announced that it will be utilising advanced technology so it can be connected to operators at all times. This will take the form of a Control Database which every operator must be linked with. This connection will enable the KSA to check digital data at any time and satisfy itself that rules are being properly adhered to.
With such a long list of requirements to qualify for a licence, the KSA has said it will be running workshops to help operators make sure they’re meeting all the conditions before applying.
November 11, 2019
Sports Betting in the US Predicted to Explode by 2025
Sports betting in the USA is only just taking a foothold now but experts believe that in the next five years it’s going to become seriously big business. Projections from gambling experts and industry investors have suggested that by 2025 the industry could be worth as much as $8 billion.
A ruling by the Supreme Court in May 2018 paved the way for individual states to start bringing in their own laws on betting and many have chosen to do so, legalising gambling as a result.
Growing number taking part
Each state is free to make up its own legislation on the subject of gambling, and an increasing number are choosing to rip up the old rules and introduce new, more lenient legislation which permits controlled betting. In little more than a year, 14 states have already introduced sports betting and many more are considering following suit.
At the NYC Sports Betting Investor Summit which took place this week, it was estimated that a minimum of 10 new gambling operators could join the market in the coming years, boosting opportunities for customers to bet.
At present the market is worth around $833 but this figure is expected to rocket in the next few years, hitting $7-8 billion by 2025. Previous estimates released suggested revenue of $5 billion by 2025, so it’s clear that the market is continuing to expand even faster than previous expected.
Caution required
Although there are clear and multiple opportunities presenting themselves within the US sports betting market, investors were quick to warn that not every operator will succeed. Huge costs relating to the acquisition and retention of customers will eat into profits and this along with intense competition could mean that many simply don’t survive.
Another hurdle that many panellists would continue to present a problem was the difficulty with crediting funds to accounts. Credit card companies in the US refuse to allow gambling transactions and this has hampered the ability of some to be able to bet. Approximately 30% of betting transactions in the US are financed from credit cards compared to 80% of bets in Europe. This could be changing in Europe however, as many countries are exploring whether a ban on credit cards in casinos would be appropriate and helpful in combating gambling addiction.
A ruling by the Supreme Court in May 2018 paved the way for individual states to start bringing in their own laws on betting and many have chosen to do so, legalising gambling as a result.
Growing number taking part
Each state is free to make up its own legislation on the subject of gambling, and an increasing number are choosing to rip up the old rules and introduce new, more lenient legislation which permits controlled betting. In little more than a year, 14 states have already introduced sports betting and many more are considering following suit.
At the NYC Sports Betting Investor Summit which took place this week, it was estimated that a minimum of 10 new gambling operators could join the market in the coming years, boosting opportunities for customers to bet.
At present the market is worth around $833 but this figure is expected to rocket in the next few years, hitting $7-8 billion by 2025. Previous estimates released suggested revenue of $5 billion by 2025, so it’s clear that the market is continuing to expand even faster than previous expected.
Caution required
Although there are clear and multiple opportunities presenting themselves within the US sports betting market, investors were quick to warn that not every operator will succeed. Huge costs relating to the acquisition and retention of customers will eat into profits and this along with intense competition could mean that many simply don’t survive.
Another hurdle that many panellists would continue to present a problem was the difficulty with crediting funds to accounts. Credit card companies in the US refuse to allow gambling transactions and this has hampered the ability of some to be able to bet. Approximately 30% of betting transactions in the US are financed from credit cards compared to 80% of bets in Europe. This could be changing in Europe however, as many countries are exploring whether a ban on credit cards in casinos would be appropriate and helpful in combating gambling addiction.
October 08, 2019
RFID implicated in live-streamed poker cheating scandal
Seems a pro-poker player, Mike Postle, has achieved impossible-seeming results. Other players have put hours upon hours upon hours into analyzing his baffling play. It is like watching someone play with perfect information, they claim!
While nothing definitive has been found, Stones Gambling Hall, a live poker site where the questionable Postle has spent a lot of time live streaming, has stopped using RFID chipped playing cards and hired an investigator.
It’s not just that Postle is winning, it’s how he’s winning, that is drawing suspicion. Ingram, Berkey and others have spent hours reviewing hands Postle played and found several times where Postle made a fold or a call that wouldn’t seem “right” but happened to work out in his favor.
Berkey said Postle made plays no pro would ever make, and he did them often, and they worked. Poker is a game of incomplete information. Berkey said Postle played “as if he had perfect information.”
Stones Gambling Hall said it has hired an independent investigator to look into the accusations.
In a statement Stones Gambling Hall said: “We temporarily halted all broadcasts from Stones. We have also, as a result, halted the use of RFID playing cards.”
While nothing definitive has been found, Stones Gambling Hall, a live poker site where the questionable Postle has spent a lot of time live streaming, has stopped using RFID chipped playing cards and hired an investigator.
It’s not just that Postle is winning, it’s how he’s winning, that is drawing suspicion. Ingram, Berkey and others have spent hours reviewing hands Postle played and found several times where Postle made a fold or a call that wouldn’t seem “right” but happened to work out in his favor.
Berkey said Postle made plays no pro would ever make, and he did them often, and they worked. Poker is a game of incomplete information. Berkey said Postle played “as if he had perfect information.”
Stones Gambling Hall said it has hired an independent investigator to look into the accusations.
In a statement Stones Gambling Hall said: “We temporarily halted all broadcasts from Stones. We have also, as a result, halted the use of RFID playing cards.”
October 02, 2019
Flutter Entertainment To Merge With Stars Group
In a major development this morning it was announced that Flutter Entertainment which owns Paddy Power and Betfair are to merge with online poker giant The Stars Group.
It will become once the deal is finalised the worlds largest gambling entity with combined revenues of £3.8 billion based on 2018 figures.
Flutter Entertainment was only created in 2016 with the merger of Paddy Power and Betfair and the new merger will see Flutter hold a 54.6% share in the combined business with The Stars Group holding 45.4%.
It is understood shareholders will approve the deal in the second quarter of 2020 and completion will be done by the end of 2020.
Observers say that with the merger the new company will be a huge player in the US market with both betting and poker being the new businesses major brands.
Peter Jackson the Chief Executive of Flutter said of the deal, “The combination represents a great opportunity to deliver a step-change in our presence in international markets and ensure we are ideally positioned to take advantage of the exciting opportunity in the US through a media relationship with FOX Sports as well as our development of US sports betting through Flutter’s FanDuel and TSG’s FOX Bet brands.2 He went on to say, “We are committed to these two high-quality brands to drive the growth of the combined group in the US.”
Stars Group Chief Executive Rafi Ashkenazi said: “This exciting combination will allow us to enhance and accelerate our existing strategy. The combination with Flutter will further enhance our company’s core strengths, and position us strongly for the future in this rapidly evolving industry.”
It is understood that oce the business is full combined Rafi Ashkenazi will assume the role of Chief Operating Officer.
It has also been confirmed that the newly combined company will be incorporated, headquartered and domiciled in Dublin, Ireland, what will become of The Stars Group Headquarters in Isle Of Man has not yet been announced.
It will become once the deal is finalised the worlds largest gambling entity with combined revenues of £3.8 billion based on 2018 figures.
Flutter Entertainment was only created in 2016 with the merger of Paddy Power and Betfair and the new merger will see Flutter hold a 54.6% share in the combined business with The Stars Group holding 45.4%.
It is understood shareholders will approve the deal in the second quarter of 2020 and completion will be done by the end of 2020.
Observers say that with the merger the new company will be a huge player in the US market with both betting and poker being the new businesses major brands.
Peter Jackson the Chief Executive of Flutter said of the deal, “The combination represents a great opportunity to deliver a step-change in our presence in international markets and ensure we are ideally positioned to take advantage of the exciting opportunity in the US through a media relationship with FOX Sports as well as our development of US sports betting through Flutter’s FanDuel and TSG’s FOX Bet brands.2 He went on to say, “We are committed to these two high-quality brands to drive the growth of the combined group in the US.”
Stars Group Chief Executive Rafi Ashkenazi said: “This exciting combination will allow us to enhance and accelerate our existing strategy. The combination with Flutter will further enhance our company’s core strengths, and position us strongly for the future in this rapidly evolving industry.”
It is understood that oce the business is full combined Rafi Ashkenazi will assume the role of Chief Operating Officer.
It has also been confirmed that the newly combined company will be incorporated, headquartered and domiciled in Dublin, Ireland, what will become of The Stars Group Headquarters in Isle Of Man has not yet been announced.
September 26, 2019
Panama to Scrap Gambling Tax to Attract Tourists
Panama has announced sweeping new changes to the taxation of betting in the country, with the abolition of the unpopular 5.5% Income Tax. Under the new rules, players will be able to receive their winnings tax-free whether they choose to take it as chips or cash.
The move is a desperate attempt to prop up the diminishing tourism industry in Panama and there are hopes that lucrative rules around betting will lure more visitors to the country.
Junta de Control de Juegos (JCJ), the body responsible for gambling regulation in Panama, announced that it would be introducing changes relating to the taxation of betting. The 5.5% tax which currently applies to gambling winnings is being scrapped by the Ministry of Economy and Finance.
The tax was originally introduced in 2015 with the aim of raising revenue to pay for retirement benefits for citizens. However, this levy was a policy of the previous government and the current incumbents believe that it is proving detrimental to the tourist trade.
The secretary of the JCJ confirmed that the income tax would be abolished right across the board on all aspects of gambling in Panama. This includes casino tables, slots, bingo and sports betting and is designed to encourage more tourists the visit the country.
Getting rid of tax on gambling winnings has proved to be a popular policy with a number of agencies. The head of the tourist body Autoridad de Turismo de Panama has backed the plan. The tourist industry has slumped with the loss of approximately 40,000 jobs and hotel occupation rates plunging to below 45% in the last two years.
The gambling body in Panama, Asociación de Administradores de Juegos de Azar, has been campaigning for the tax to be scrapped since it was first introduced four years ago. They believe that the taxes has played a part in persuading local players and international gamblers to visit neighbouring countries instead.
At the same time as getting rid of the tax for players, the Panama government is preparing to introduce a new audit system for operators. Using an “interconnected electronic system” the government will be ensuring that operators are paying the right amount of tax, and will also be stepping up their monitoring activity to identify taxable revenue.
Inside sources have suggested that many of the changes announced have been implemented as a result of a recent meeting between the head of the JCJ and his Mexican equivalent, Luis Calvo Reyes, who leads Mexico’s gambling regulatory body.
The move is a desperate attempt to prop up the diminishing tourism industry in Panama and there are hopes that lucrative rules around betting will lure more visitors to the country.
Junta de Control de Juegos (JCJ), the body responsible for gambling regulation in Panama, announced that it would be introducing changes relating to the taxation of betting. The 5.5% tax which currently applies to gambling winnings is being scrapped by the Ministry of Economy and Finance.
The tax was originally introduced in 2015 with the aim of raising revenue to pay for retirement benefits for citizens. However, this levy was a policy of the previous government and the current incumbents believe that it is proving detrimental to the tourist trade.
The secretary of the JCJ confirmed that the income tax would be abolished right across the board on all aspects of gambling in Panama. This includes casino tables, slots, bingo and sports betting and is designed to encourage more tourists the visit the country.
Getting rid of tax on gambling winnings has proved to be a popular policy with a number of agencies. The head of the tourist body Autoridad de Turismo de Panama has backed the plan. The tourist industry has slumped with the loss of approximately 40,000 jobs and hotel occupation rates plunging to below 45% in the last two years.
The gambling body in Panama, Asociación de Administradores de Juegos de Azar, has been campaigning for the tax to be scrapped since it was first introduced four years ago. They believe that the taxes has played a part in persuading local players and international gamblers to visit neighbouring countries instead.
At the same time as getting rid of the tax for players, the Panama government is preparing to introduce a new audit system for operators. Using an “interconnected electronic system” the government will be ensuring that operators are paying the right amount of tax, and will also be stepping up their monitoring activity to identify taxable revenue.
Inside sources have suggested that many of the changes announced have been implemented as a result of a recent meeting between the head of the JCJ and his Mexican equivalent, Luis Calvo Reyes, who leads Mexico’s gambling regulatory body.
September 24, 2019
Gambling and football: a relationship under scrutiny
When Championship club Derby County signed Wayne Rooney, record goalscorer for England and Manchester United, this month, pundits asked whether the transfer was to strengthen the team or improve its financial position off the pitch.
Derby, which plays in English football’s second tier, announced that Rooney would wear the number 32 shirt when he joined the team in January, while also revealing a “record-breaking [shirt] sponsorship deal” with 32Red, a Gibraltar-based online bookmaker.
The apparent connection between shirt number and sponsor drew widespread condemnation from UK newspapers, politicians and church groups. They say the deal is only the latest example of bookmakers and clubs pushing their commercial relationship too far, without regard to how children and addicts are bombarded with messages that encourage betting during matches.
GVC Holdings, one of the world’s largest online gambling groups and owner of bookmaker Ladbrokes Coral, has called for a ban on betting groups sponsoring football clubs. “There has been far too much perimeter adverts, TV adverts, bookmakers splashed across football jerseys,” said Kenny Alexander, chief executive.
Such restrictions would match new laws in Italy, home of another of Europe’s biggest leagues, that came into full force this year. Meanwhile, in May, German regulators warned the country’s football association over its sponsorship deal with GVC’s Bwin brand, arguing such partnerships could breach a ban on advertising online casino and slot games.
Similar rules in the UK would threaten the relationship between betting and English football. The sport has been associated with gambling for decades, such as through “pools” markets where fans bet small stakes on the outcome of matches, and the two industries have enjoyed strong revenue growth in recent years partly because of their close financial ties.
Interviews with more than a dozen senior betting and football industry executives, many of whom spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the subject, said a fierce debate was taking place on how best to head off a larger regulatory backlash and show gambling groups and clubs were responding to public concern about their close financial ties.
Mr Alexander called 32Red’s deal with Derby County “ridiculous, at a time when the industry is being attacked [and] we are trying to get the industry off the front pages”.
Though Derby’s owner Mel Morris said the Rooney transfer provided “commercial opportunities that are significant and widespread”, the club said it would not provide further detail on “commercially sensitive business operations”.
Football shirts are attractive billboards, allowing gambling companies to reach hundreds of millions of fans around the world.
According to Global Betting and Gaming Consultants, in the UK alone, gross gambling yield — the sum of bets placed minus winnings — from football rose from £908.5m in the year to April 2016, to £1.4bn in the same period last year.
Sponsorship of English teams also helps to target fans in Asia, where Premier League football shirts pushes company logos to fans without falling foul of local laws, such as in China where online gambling is banned, or Australia, where there is a ban on betting groups advertising on television during sports matches.
Half of the 20 teams in the English Premier League and two-thirds of the 24 clubs in the Championship have gambling company logos on their shirts.
The sponsors are diverse. Everton and Hull City’s main sponsor is Kenya-based SportPesa, the Chinese characters of Malta-registered Asian betting brand LoveBet adorns the shirts of Burnley, while Filipino group Dafabet features on Norwich City shirts.
These 26 teams made £225.2m in commercial revenues in 2018, representing 11 per cent of the clubs’ total revenues, according to an analysis of their financial records. Shirt sponsorships are typically the largest individual commercial deal available to most clubs. this differs
However, none of the so-called big six clubs — Manchester United, Manchester City, Arsenal, Tottenham Hotspur, Chelsea and Liverpool — have a gambling group as shirt sponsor, though Spurs has done previously. These clubs, among the 10 richest clubs in the world, can command lucrative commercial tie-ups with global brands willing to pay big to reach an enormous international fan base. Manchester United’s main shirt sponsor, Chevrolet, pays $80m year to appear on its shirts.
Instead, it is smaller clubs, which do not command such large support but still regularly appear on television screens in the UK and worldwide, targeted by gambling sponsors with smaller marketing budgets. For Championship clubs with gambling shirt sponsors, commercial income accounts for about 14 per cent of revenues.
Executives at these teams say privately that although shirt deals are typically worth less than £10m, even obscure betting groups offer far more than better known companies in other sectors.
“Commercial agreements between leagues, clubs and betting companies make a significant contribution to the ongoing financial sustainability of professional football at all levels,” said the English Football League, the body that runs professional divisions below the Premier League. “The EFL strongly believes that there has to be an approach whereby football can work with gambling companies in a sensible and socially responsible way.”
Nigel Adams, the UK’s sport minister, has warned clubs to abide by the “spirit of the rules”on accepting betting sponsorships. But there are no formal rules restricting gambling companies from endorsing clubs, while football’s governing bodies have also been caught between commercial imperatives and moral concerns.
In 2017, the Football Association pulled out of a sponsorship deal with Ladbrokes Coral worth £4m a year. This followed criticism from the player Joey Barton, who was banned by the FA for 18 months for placing bets on matches. Mr Barton said it was hypocritical for the body to impose such a ban while having commercial partnerships with gambling companies.
The English Football League has a sponsorship contract with online bookmaker SkyBet worth up to £4m a year, but said it also used the deal to promote responsible gambling messages on shirtsleeves and works with clubs to limit harm to vulnerable fans.
The opposition Labour Party has called for an outright ban on gambling firms sponsoring football clubs. “These companies are making fans feel they don’t have a stake in the game unless they have a bet,” said Tom Watson, Labour’s deputy leader.
Anti-gambling activists have also been buoyed by their success in forcing the UK government to drastically cut the maximum stake on fixed-odds betting terminals, high speed slot machines in betting shops — a move strongly resisted by high street bookmakers. According to analysts at Barclays, Ladbrokes Coral, William Hill and Paddy Power Betfair, will suffer a combined £785m loss in annual revenues thanks to the new FOBT regulations, which came into effect in April.
Shaken by this regulatory defeat, gambling executives held discussions on how to get ahead of further curbs and show their companies are responding to public concern.
At the start of this month, GVC, William Hill, Flutter, SkyBet and Bet365 began a voluntary “whistle-to-whistle” ban on advertising between the start and finish of sports fixtures, among other measures to protect punters.
Peter Jackson, chief executive of Flutter, said that the collaboration was “unprecedented”. According to one executive at a UK gambling company, the aim was to avoid “counterproductive” regulation.
But betting groups want publicity that helps them stand out.
Championship side Huddersfield Town last month unveiled a shirt dominated by a large sash bearing the logo of Paddy Power, the Irish betting brand owned by London-listed Flutter.
The FTSE 100 company later revealed the kit was an elaborate marketing stunt, with Paddy Power declaring it would instead pay for Huddersfield and three other English clubs to keep their shirts free of any branding whatsoever this season.
“While the hoax part of the campaign initially divided opinion, the subsequent reveal has prompted support from many fans and started a public debate about shirt sponsorship in football more broadly,” said Flutter.
This month, the FA charged the Yorkshire-based club with misconduct saying the club had broken rules about the size of corporate logos on shirts. A hearing on the matter is due to be held. Callum Limb, a Huddersfield spokesman, said “it doesn’t seem right to be talking about something that is currently under FA investigation”.
Industry watchdog the Gambling Commission also this month launched an investigation into Russian betting firm 1xBet, and the company’s UK website was taken down. It followed allegations revealed in a Sunday Times investigation that the group had promoted a “pornhub casino”, which uses topless croupiers, and had advertised on illegal websites.
In response, 1xBet told the newspaper it would investigate immediately if any third-party networks or partners were found to advertise its brand on banned sites or sites that break the law.
Neil Banbury, general manager at 32Red, which sparked controversy with its deal with Derby, defends the tie-ups between clubs and betting groups, however.
“Gambling companies and the wider industry has an important role to play in tackling problem gambling,” he said. “To remove the industry from the public’s eye would be irresponsible.”
Derby, which plays in English football’s second tier, announced that Rooney would wear the number 32 shirt when he joined the team in January, while also revealing a “record-breaking [shirt] sponsorship deal” with 32Red, a Gibraltar-based online bookmaker.
The apparent connection between shirt number and sponsor drew widespread condemnation from UK newspapers, politicians and church groups. They say the deal is only the latest example of bookmakers and clubs pushing their commercial relationship too far, without regard to how children and addicts are bombarded with messages that encourage betting during matches.
GVC Holdings, one of the world’s largest online gambling groups and owner of bookmaker Ladbrokes Coral, has called for a ban on betting groups sponsoring football clubs. “There has been far too much perimeter adverts, TV adverts, bookmakers splashed across football jerseys,” said Kenny Alexander, chief executive.
Such restrictions would match new laws in Italy, home of another of Europe’s biggest leagues, that came into full force this year. Meanwhile, in May, German regulators warned the country’s football association over its sponsorship deal with GVC’s Bwin brand, arguing such partnerships could breach a ban on advertising online casino and slot games.
Similar rules in the UK would threaten the relationship between betting and English football. The sport has been associated with gambling for decades, such as through “pools” markets where fans bet small stakes on the outcome of matches, and the two industries have enjoyed strong revenue growth in recent years partly because of their close financial ties.
Interviews with more than a dozen senior betting and football industry executives, many of whom spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the subject, said a fierce debate was taking place on how best to head off a larger regulatory backlash and show gambling groups and clubs were responding to public concern about their close financial ties.
Mr Alexander called 32Red’s deal with Derby County “ridiculous, at a time when the industry is being attacked [and] we are trying to get the industry off the front pages”.
Though Derby’s owner Mel Morris said the Rooney transfer provided “commercial opportunities that are significant and widespread”, the club said it would not provide further detail on “commercially sensitive business operations”.
Football shirts are attractive billboards, allowing gambling companies to reach hundreds of millions of fans around the world.
According to Global Betting and Gaming Consultants, in the UK alone, gross gambling yield — the sum of bets placed minus winnings — from football rose from £908.5m in the year to April 2016, to £1.4bn in the same period last year.
Sponsorship of English teams also helps to target fans in Asia, where Premier League football shirts pushes company logos to fans without falling foul of local laws, such as in China where online gambling is banned, or Australia, where there is a ban on betting groups advertising on television during sports matches.
Half of the 20 teams in the English Premier League and two-thirds of the 24 clubs in the Championship have gambling company logos on their shirts.
The sponsors are diverse. Everton and Hull City’s main sponsor is Kenya-based SportPesa, the Chinese characters of Malta-registered Asian betting brand LoveBet adorns the shirts of Burnley, while Filipino group Dafabet features on Norwich City shirts.
These 26 teams made £225.2m in commercial revenues in 2018, representing 11 per cent of the clubs’ total revenues, according to an analysis of their financial records. Shirt sponsorships are typically the largest individual commercial deal available to most clubs. this differs
However, none of the so-called big six clubs — Manchester United, Manchester City, Arsenal, Tottenham Hotspur, Chelsea and Liverpool — have a gambling group as shirt sponsor, though Spurs has done previously. These clubs, among the 10 richest clubs in the world, can command lucrative commercial tie-ups with global brands willing to pay big to reach an enormous international fan base. Manchester United’s main shirt sponsor, Chevrolet, pays $80m year to appear on its shirts.
Instead, it is smaller clubs, which do not command such large support but still regularly appear on television screens in the UK and worldwide, targeted by gambling sponsors with smaller marketing budgets. For Championship clubs with gambling shirt sponsors, commercial income accounts for about 14 per cent of revenues.
Executives at these teams say privately that although shirt deals are typically worth less than £10m, even obscure betting groups offer far more than better known companies in other sectors.
“Commercial agreements between leagues, clubs and betting companies make a significant contribution to the ongoing financial sustainability of professional football at all levels,” said the English Football League, the body that runs professional divisions below the Premier League. “The EFL strongly believes that there has to be an approach whereby football can work with gambling companies in a sensible and socially responsible way.”
Nigel Adams, the UK’s sport minister, has warned clubs to abide by the “spirit of the rules”on accepting betting sponsorships. But there are no formal rules restricting gambling companies from endorsing clubs, while football’s governing bodies have also been caught between commercial imperatives and moral concerns.
In 2017, the Football Association pulled out of a sponsorship deal with Ladbrokes Coral worth £4m a year. This followed criticism from the player Joey Barton, who was banned by the FA for 18 months for placing bets on matches. Mr Barton said it was hypocritical for the body to impose such a ban while having commercial partnerships with gambling companies.
The English Football League has a sponsorship contract with online bookmaker SkyBet worth up to £4m a year, but said it also used the deal to promote responsible gambling messages on shirtsleeves and works with clubs to limit harm to vulnerable fans.
The opposition Labour Party has called for an outright ban on gambling firms sponsoring football clubs. “These companies are making fans feel they don’t have a stake in the game unless they have a bet,” said Tom Watson, Labour’s deputy leader.
Anti-gambling activists have also been buoyed by their success in forcing the UK government to drastically cut the maximum stake on fixed-odds betting terminals, high speed slot machines in betting shops — a move strongly resisted by high street bookmakers. According to analysts at Barclays, Ladbrokes Coral, William Hill and Paddy Power Betfair, will suffer a combined £785m loss in annual revenues thanks to the new FOBT regulations, which came into effect in April.
Shaken by this regulatory defeat, gambling executives held discussions on how to get ahead of further curbs and show their companies are responding to public concern.
At the start of this month, GVC, William Hill, Flutter, SkyBet and Bet365 began a voluntary “whistle-to-whistle” ban on advertising between the start and finish of sports fixtures, among other measures to protect punters.
Peter Jackson, chief executive of Flutter, said that the collaboration was “unprecedented”. According to one executive at a UK gambling company, the aim was to avoid “counterproductive” regulation.
But betting groups want publicity that helps them stand out.
Championship side Huddersfield Town last month unveiled a shirt dominated by a large sash bearing the logo of Paddy Power, the Irish betting brand owned by London-listed Flutter.
The FTSE 100 company later revealed the kit was an elaborate marketing stunt, with Paddy Power declaring it would instead pay for Huddersfield and three other English clubs to keep their shirts free of any branding whatsoever this season.
“While the hoax part of the campaign initially divided opinion, the subsequent reveal has prompted support from many fans and started a public debate about shirt sponsorship in football more broadly,” said Flutter.
This month, the FA charged the Yorkshire-based club with misconduct saying the club had broken rules about the size of corporate logos on shirts. A hearing on the matter is due to be held. Callum Limb, a Huddersfield spokesman, said “it doesn’t seem right to be talking about something that is currently under FA investigation”.
Industry watchdog the Gambling Commission also this month launched an investigation into Russian betting firm 1xBet, and the company’s UK website was taken down. It followed allegations revealed in a Sunday Times investigation that the group had promoted a “pornhub casino”, which uses topless croupiers, and had advertised on illegal websites.
In response, 1xBet told the newspaper it would investigate immediately if any third-party networks or partners were found to advertise its brand on banned sites or sites that break the law.
Neil Banbury, general manager at 32Red, which sparked controversy with its deal with Derby, defends the tie-ups between clubs and betting groups, however.
“Gambling companies and the wider industry has an important role to play in tackling problem gambling,” he said. “To remove the industry from the public’s eye would be irresponsible.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)